PEDs: The athlete's attorney
Written by: Dan Empfield
Date: Fri May 06 2011
Howard Jacobs is a sports lawyer, probably the foremost attorney defending clients against charges stemming from positive anti-doping tests. Jacobs wins some, he loses some, but his client list of athletes who've faced disciplinary action—which numbers about 75—know Jacobs is a skilled advocate. Imagine a positive drug test returned by a famous athlete over the past decade. Chances are Jacobs was that athlete's lawyer.
Howard Jacobs is also a triathlete, I've known him for close to 15 years, and I've interviewed him in the context of cases he's tried while representing federations against athletes—in the distant past!—and in recent years, where the reverse has been the case. Because Slowtwitchers have had an opportunity to hear from USADA's chief executive this week, as well as the anti-doping director for WTC, it might be instructive to know what the process looks like from the other side: from the athlete's side, once an adverse finding is returned.
Howard Jacobs is also a triathlete, I've known him for close to 15 years, and I've interviewed him in the context of cases he's tried while representing federations against athletes—in the distant past!—and in recent years, where the reverse has been the case. Because Slowtwitchers have had an opportunity to hear from USADA's chief executive this week, as well as the anti-doping director for WTC, it might be instructive to know what the process looks like from the other side: from the athlete's side, once an adverse finding is returned.
SLOWTWITCH: Age-group drug testing. I have some specific questions but before we get started give me a sense of where you personally stand on the subject.
HOWARD JACOBS: In general, my biggest question, both from what I do professionally, and as an age-group triathlete myself, I wonder where the clamor is for this type of testing? Second, where's the money coming from? Unless USADA or WTC or USAT has a grant, maybe from a private donor for this specifically, you must assume that every single test for an age-grouper is a test they can't do for an elite.
SLOWTWITCH: Still, when we poll on this question, 80 percent of our readers want age-group testing. Isn't USA Triathlon in step with what it's membership is asking for?
HOWARD JACOBS: I'd be curious as to the rationale. If I race as an age-grouper, and somebody beats me who is doping, honestly I don't care. I'm not racing as a pro, I've never taken a PED, I don't take a single supplement, not even a vitamin. To me, I race to see how far I can push myself, that's the satisfaction.
HOWARD JACOBS: In general, my biggest question, both from what I do professionally, and as an age-group triathlete myself, I wonder where the clamor is for this type of testing? Second, where's the money coming from? Unless USADA or WTC or USAT has a grant, maybe from a private donor for this specifically, you must assume that every single test for an age-grouper is a test they can't do for an elite.
SLOWTWITCH: Still, when we poll on this question, 80 percent of our readers want age-group testing. Isn't USA Triathlon in step with what it's membership is asking for?
HOWARD JACOBS: I'd be curious as to the rationale. If I race as an age-grouper, and somebody beats me who is doping, honestly I don't care. I'm not racing as a pro, I've never taken a PED, I don't take a single supplement, not even a vitamin. To me, I race to see how far I can push myself, that's the satisfaction.
SLOWTWITCH: Let's get down to the business end of this—the mechanics. And I ask this so that drug-takers might understand the risk they're taking, and so that the innocent among us understand the gravity of an inadvertent positive. Let's say an age-grouper gets popped. He's a Sunday school teacher, airline pilot, cop, fireman, he's a high school teacher or coach, he's a judge, he's a district attorney, he's a triathlon federation or a USADA employee, an editor of a trathon magazine: Is it in your opinion, or do you have experience that leads you to believe, that he'll need to mount a defense in order to protect his reputation and maybe his job?
HOWARD JACOBS: I think so, because, let's say—and the only reason I use the supplement contamination example is because I've seen it so many times—USADA says they're going to suspend you for 2 years. By the way, it may be even more because they have a provision now called aggravating circumstances, whereby they can ask for more than 2 years. The 75 athletes I've represented are all professional athletes, for any one of them who got suspended, if you Google their names the first thing that comes up is their suspension. The burden, if you test positive, all they [USADA] have to do is come in and dump the lab documents on the arbitrator. The burden then shifts to the athlete. The athlete must prove where the contamination came from.
HOWARD JACOBS: I think so, because, let's say—and the only reason I use the supplement contamination example is because I've seen it so many times—USADA says they're going to suspend you for 2 years. By the way, it may be even more because they have a provision now called aggravating circumstances, whereby they can ask for more than 2 years. The 75 athletes I've represented are all professional athletes, for any one of them who got suspended, if you Google their names the first thing that comes up is their suspension. The burden, if you test positive, all they [USADA] have to do is come in and dump the lab documents on the arbitrator. The burden then shifts to the athlete. The athlete must prove where the contamination came from.
SLOWTWITCH: Give us numbers here. In truth, when an adverse finding is returned, in your opinion and experience, what's typical?
HOWARD JACOBS: About two-thirds of the cases I've handled stemmed from inadvertent mistakes by the athlete or by somebody: tainted supplements; or not filling out the paperwork properly. A fourth to a third of the cases with which I've dealt were intentional, or, no good explanation could be provided by the athlete. By and large, if you had the money and the desire to cheat, you're less likely to get caught than if you try to play by the rules.
SLOWTWITCH: I'll ask about the cost in a minute. But first, what does the defense look like? Take me through the process, and the timeline.
HOWARD JACOBS: If it's with USADA, after a positive test you get notified. You have an opportunity to accept the sanction, or the right to have the B sample tested. That process might take a couple of weeks. You can pay someone to attend the testing of the B sample if you want. You get a letter, the B confirms the A. "We're going to send the case to our Independent Doping Review Board," the letter says, sort of like their grand jury, and 99 percent of the time they find in favor of the positive test. You then get a letter confirming this, and—if you choose to fight—the entire arbitration takes about 4 months. In the U.S., after the first arbitration, if either side is unhappy with the result, they can appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. That's a de novo hearing, which means they look at the case all over again.
HOWARD JACOBS: About two-thirds of the cases I've handled stemmed from inadvertent mistakes by the athlete or by somebody: tainted supplements; or not filling out the paperwork properly. A fourth to a third of the cases with which I've dealt were intentional, or, no good explanation could be provided by the athlete. By and large, if you had the money and the desire to cheat, you're less likely to get caught than if you try to play by the rules.
SLOWTWITCH: I'll ask about the cost in a minute. But first, what does the defense look like? Take me through the process, and the timeline.
HOWARD JACOBS: If it's with USADA, after a positive test you get notified. You have an opportunity to accept the sanction, or the right to have the B sample tested. That process might take a couple of weeks. You can pay someone to attend the testing of the B sample if you want. You get a letter, the B confirms the A. "We're going to send the case to our Independent Doping Review Board," the letter says, sort of like their grand jury, and 99 percent of the time they find in favor of the positive test. You then get a letter confirming this, and—if you choose to fight—the entire arbitration takes about 4 months. In the U.S., after the first arbitration, if either side is unhappy with the result, they can appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. That's a de novo hearing, which means they look at the case all over again.
SLOWTWITCH: What does a proper defense cost? There are at least two entire court cases if any side appeals—which is likely—there's legal fees, travel fees, expert witness fees, what are we looking at?
HOWARD JACOBS: Expert fees can be a couple of thousand dollars up to several tens of thousands. Kind of the same with legal fees. It's never going to be less than 10 or 15 grand to go to an arbitration case, unless you get some sort of pro bono defense, such as sports clinics, which are law students overseen by a professor.
SLOWTWITCH: So, again, not to scare anybody unduly—or maybe to scare them if they're now taking or considering taking performance enhancing drugs and competing—what's the human cost exclusive of the finances of defense, and the inability to compete in your sport of choice, or any sport among the 45 under the Olympic umbrella?
HOWARD JACOBS: There certainly could be a human cost, every situation is different, but, there are athletes I've represented who were track and cross-country coaches, who lost their jobs over it, usually due to an uproar in a community: "How can you let these people coach our kids?" I can imagine this might be the case in general with a schoolteacher. If you're a USAT coach, or any kind of coach, I would imagine it would be a problem keeping your certification.
HOWARD JACOBS: Expert fees can be a couple of thousand dollars up to several tens of thousands. Kind of the same with legal fees. It's never going to be less than 10 or 15 grand to go to an arbitration case, unless you get some sort of pro bono defense, such as sports clinics, which are law students overseen by a professor.
SLOWTWITCH: So, again, not to scare anybody unduly—or maybe to scare them if they're now taking or considering taking performance enhancing drugs and competing—what's the human cost exclusive of the finances of defense, and the inability to compete in your sport of choice, or any sport among the 45 under the Olympic umbrella?
HOWARD JACOBS: There certainly could be a human cost, every situation is different, but, there are athletes I've represented who were track and cross-country coaches, who lost their jobs over it, usually due to an uproar in a community: "How can you let these people coach our kids?" I can imagine this might be the case in general with a schoolteacher. If you're a USAT coach, or any kind of coach, I would imagine it would be a problem keeping your certification.
SLOWTWITCH: On the bright side, Howard, age-group testing might represent a whole new revenue stream for you!
Articles related to this one
Age group drug testing at Ironman
What's the drug testing at Ironman all about? We interviewed the director of its anti-doping program, Kate Mittelstadt. 5.05.11
What's the drug testing at Ironman all about? We interviewed the director of its anti-doping program, Kate Mittelstadt. 5.05.11
Travis Tygart: America's top PED cop
Travis Tygart is America's top cop in the fight against performance enhancing drugs. He's USADA's CEO, formerly its general counsel. I asked him questions about its drug testing program for age-group triathletes. 5.03.11
Travis Tygart is America's top cop in the fight against performance enhancing drugs. He's USADA's CEO, formerly its general counsel. I asked him questions about its drug testing program for age-group triathletes. 5.03.11
Comments
PEDs: The athlete's attorney
Dan Empfield
Reviewed by: DavidM, May 24 2011 6:01AM
"HOWARD JACOBS: About two-thirds of the cases I've handled stemmed from inadvertent mistakes by the athlete or by somebody... A fourth to a third of the cases with which I've dealt were intentional, or, no good explanation could be provided by the athlete. By and large, if you had the money and the desire to cheat, you're less likely to get caught than if you try to play by the rules."
That conclusion doesn't follow.
That conclusion doesn't follow.
AG Drug Testin
Reviewed by: TriDork, May 15 2011 5:28PM
I found the article a little disappointing, particularly Howards comment about motivation. He has his stated motivation for racing (testing himself) and assumes that we are all the same. He neglects to consider (at least in the interview) that Ag'ers race for all sorts of reasons, and therefore all sorts of motivations. For example, a guy just about qualifying for Kona, may miss out for a few years and to increase his chances of qualifying, may choose to take PED's. If he beats me personally, no big deal, but for the guy who should have got the slot, but didn't, got screwed and would be pretty pissed if he found out some jerk cheated him out of his rightful spot. Of course, other situations or motivations can lead an AG'er to cheat also.
There's also the assertion that testing an AG'er means a pro doesn't get tested. AG'ers provide a large amount of money to the governing body. The governing body has rules against PED use and can rightfully be expected to enforce those rules.......and with PED use, testing is currently the only realistic method of enforcing those rules.
It may (or may not) be true that AG'ers have less motivation to use PED's but there has to be at least a token amount of AG testing to provide some measure of motivation for AG'ers to race clean.
Other than that, the article was good albeit a bit short for a subject and large and complex as AG PED use.
There's also the assertion that testing an AG'er means a pro doesn't get tested. AG'ers provide a large amount of money to the governing body. The governing body has rules against PED use and can rightfully be expected to enforce those rules.......and with PED use, testing is currently the only realistic method of enforcing those rules.
It may (or may not) be true that AG'ers have less motivation to use PED's but there has to be at least a token amount of AG testing to provide some measure of motivation for AG'ers to race clean.
Other than that, the article was good albeit a bit short for a subject and large and complex as AG PED use.
The masses may want it until the first false positive kicks in..
Reviewed by: Jon, May 9 2011 10:45AM
Nice interview and the atty makes it clear. The odds are an innocent person could get nailed both financially and sportwise with a false positive..
For a pure amateur, who is doing this for FUN.. not money.. That becomes a big risk.. I'm drug free.. but what happens if I get nailed with a false positive and loose my job.. Let that happen once to a AGer and see how fast numbers drop in attendance.
For a pure amateur, who is doing this for FUN.. not money.. That becomes a big risk.. I'm drug free.. but what happens if I get nailed with a false positive and loose my job.. Let that happen once to a AGer and see how fast numbers drop in attendance.
Balanced
.0.
Reviewed by: Myles mc corry, May 6 2011 10:29PM
I understand you can't ask how does it feel defending the guilty! Cheating athletes are destroying the integrity of sport but the innocent must be protected. Has he any advice on improving the testing system to prevent the false positives or inadvertant consumption ?
Myles
playpure.org
Myles
playpure.org
Rationale for testing Age Groupers
Reviewed by: Paul, May 6 2011 3:51PM
I find it hard to believe that Howard Jacobs doesn't understand why most people would like to see Age Groupers tested. Here are a few:
1) Because we believe illegal drugs are easy to acquire and prevalent.
2) Because we do not like being beaten by dopers.
3) Because we would like a slot to the world champs and don't want our opportunity taken from us by dopers.
1) Because we believe illegal drugs are easy to acquire and prevalent.
2) Because we do not like being beaten by dopers.
3) Because we would like a slot to the world champs and don't want our opportunity taken from us by dopers.
