Brooks Glycerin 9 (2012)
Written by: Jeroen Van Geelen
Date: Mon Sep 26 2011
Brooks updated its Glycerin by extending its proprietary midsole material—Brooks DNA—through the full length of the shoe. Brooks explains this material as follows:
Engineered from what's called a non-Newtonian liquid, this midsole technology responds to the amount of force placed on the foot and disperses the pressure, providing just the right amount of resiliency. Simply put, you can expect soft comfort when you want it, firm support when you need it.
Explanations like this make me nervous. There is no material that softens when you are heavier or run slower; yet hardens when you go faster or when you want a more active ride. Brooks isn’t the only company that employs this kind of text—K-Swiss spins a similar story for its Blade series—but I wish each company would refrain from explanations that strain the credulity of the reader.
But this doesn’t make the Glycerin 9 a bad shoe. On the contrary. I think it’s an excellent update and for a runner who thinks the new Gel Nimbus is just a bit too soft or too narrow they should give these new Glycerins a try.
Whereas the Gel Nimbus feels so soft it sucks most of the energy out of any attempt to run at speed, the Glycerin 9 feels soft-but-springy, rather than soft-and-energy-absorbant. It’s just more active than the Gel Nimbus 13. It’s also a little bit wider in the forefoot, and feels good to my foot when I put it on.
Fit is personal, but I found the Glycerin 9 supportive, due I think to the position of the laces and several overlays of upper material.
Although I’m not a heel striker I can certainly feel this is a shoe that will work for this type of running form, because of the bounce and spring. But Brooks is hedging its bet, and will soon launch its Pure Project—its first collection of natural running shoes.
The Glycerin 9 is a very good update, with lots of breathable material, and its proprietary BioMoGo sole material which degrades 50 times faster than most other midsole materials.
You can forget about the “Brooks DNA” mumbo jumbo, but acknowledge and be thankful for everything else in these shoes. You will have a pair of very cushioned and—for a neutral shoe— a very stable shoe to run in. They’re about as stable as you’re likely to find in the neutral category.
These shoes come in a men D width, in women B width, and in 2 specific men and women colors.
Engineered from what's called a non-Newtonian liquid, this midsole technology responds to the amount of force placed on the foot and disperses the pressure, providing just the right amount of resiliency. Simply put, you can expect soft comfort when you want it, firm support when you need it.
Explanations like this make me nervous. There is no material that softens when you are heavier or run slower; yet hardens when you go faster or when you want a more active ride. Brooks isn’t the only company that employs this kind of text—K-Swiss spins a similar story for its Blade series—but I wish each company would refrain from explanations that strain the credulity of the reader.
But this doesn’t make the Glycerin 9 a bad shoe. On the contrary. I think it’s an excellent update and for a runner who thinks the new Gel Nimbus is just a bit too soft or too narrow they should give these new Glycerins a try.
Whereas the Gel Nimbus feels so soft it sucks most of the energy out of any attempt to run at speed, the Glycerin 9 feels soft-but-springy, rather than soft-and-energy-absorbant. It’s just more active than the Gel Nimbus 13. It’s also a little bit wider in the forefoot, and feels good to my foot when I put it on.
Fit is personal, but I found the Glycerin 9 supportive, due I think to the position of the laces and several overlays of upper material.
Although I’m not a heel striker I can certainly feel this is a shoe that will work for this type of running form, because of the bounce and spring. But Brooks is hedging its bet, and will soon launch its Pure Project—its first collection of natural running shoes.
The Glycerin 9 is a very good update, with lots of breathable material, and its proprietary BioMoGo sole material which degrades 50 times faster than most other midsole materials.
You can forget about the “Brooks DNA” mumbo jumbo, but acknowledge and be thankful for everything else in these shoes. You will have a pair of very cushioned and—for a neutral shoe— a very stable shoe to run in. They’re about as stable as you’re likely to find in the neutral category.
These shoes come in a men D width, in women B width, and in 2 specific men and women colors.
[Editor’s note: Our capable editor-at-large for footwear Jeroen van Geelen owns Total Running, one of the more important running and triathlon retail establishments in The Netherlands.]
Articles related to this one
Saucony ProGrid Mirage (2011)
Do you subscribe to the "natural" running philosophy, but need a bit more support? This shoe borrows from both the Kinvara and a regular training shoe. Saucony is about to score another hit in this architectural theme. 11.16.10
Do you subscribe to the "natural" running philosophy, but need a bit more support? This shoe borrows from both the Kinvara and a regular training shoe. Saucony is about to score another hit in this architectural theme. 11.16.10
Brooks Ariel/Beast (2010)
In contrast to the storming hordes proclaiming natural gaits and barefoot running, the Brooks Beast stands its post, on its wall. Overpronation? Not on its watch. 2.05.10
In contrast to the storming hordes proclaiming natural gaits and barefoot running, the Brooks Beast stands its post, on its wall. Overpronation? Not on its watch. 2.05.10
Comments
brooks glycerin 9
Reviewed by: cyril , Oct 13 2011 8:00PM
i have had nothing but trouble pins & needles numb feet & sore heels as i only use for long walking & short jogs toes come thru upper mesh thank you
Brooks Glycerin
Reviewed by: tridork, Sep 26 2011 4:05PM
I don't know if Brooks is actually using a non-Newtonian fluid or not, but they (non-Newtonian fluids) do exist, and I would suggest that they are well suited for use in a running shoe for shock absorption. I suspect that if Brooks claim to be using them, then they are in the shoe. They may or may not be the reason for the performance characteristics of the shoe, but if the shoe fits...
FWIW, non-Newtonian fluids behave exactly like Brooks say they do. While people (and the author?) may not be particularly familiar with the name, they have probably seen the famous demonstration of their behaviour. Most of us have seen the example of walking on a wet sand beach. With walking, ones feet sink some depth into the wet sand, and standing, one sinks even deeper. However, when running on the same beach, the shock of the landing foot, makes the wet sand behave in a non-Newtonian way, and becomes solid to run on.
A similar example is with corn starch and water. Push a finger slowly into the mixture and it will penetrate almost as tho it's all water. Smack the same fluid however, and the mixture will behave like a solid. This was demonstated wonderfully on an episode of the "Mythbusters" show
By tailoring the ingredients of the fluid in the shoe, the performance of the fluid can also be adjusted to suit the requirements.
FWIW, non-Newtonian fluids behave exactly like Brooks say they do. While people (and the author?) may not be particularly familiar with the name, they have probably seen the famous demonstration of their behaviour. Most of us have seen the example of walking on a wet sand beach. With walking, ones feet sink some depth into the wet sand, and standing, one sinks even deeper. However, when running on the same beach, the shock of the landing foot, makes the wet sand behave in a non-Newtonian way, and becomes solid to run on.
A similar example is with corn starch and water. Push a finger slowly into the mixture and it will penetrate almost as tho it's all water. Smack the same fluid however, and the mixture will behave like a solid. This was demonstated wonderfully on an episode of the "Mythbusters" show
By tailoring the ingredients of the fluid in the shoe, the performance of the fluid can also be adjusted to suit the requirements.
