K-Swiss Ultra-Natural Run II
Written by: Jeroen van Geelen
Date: Mon Jan 04 2010
It's Ironman branded, but, is identical to the K Swiss shoe of the same name, but without the Ironman branding on them.
They are truly different then the K-Ona which is also a lightweight trainer. The Ultra-Natural Run II and the K-Ona are both 9-ounce shoes, so there is no difference in weight. They vary mostly in the upper, which I found very comfortable and snug.
But, for a shoe that is made to mimic a more natural running gait, I find them a bit high around my ankles. The shoe touches my maleolus (the Kathy Bates bone, if you remember Misery), which is certainly not comfortable on a longer run. This unnerving feature also blocks my ankle flexibility.
The outsole is flexible, but, also again not as flexible as I would expect from a style designed to mimic or accentuate a natural running form. I find the K-Ona even more flexible than the Ultra-Natural Run II.
It's not a bad shoe, but, is it ready to do battle on an even footing with a Nike Free or a Newton? In a battle of Neutral lightweight "free form" models, no, not yet.
Still, it's one of the coolest post-race shoes going. But, I don't think that's what K-Swiss is aiming for.
[Editor’s note: Our capable editor-at-large for footwear Jeroen van Geelen owns Total Running, one of the more important running and triathlon retail establishments in The Netherlands.]
They are truly different then the K-Ona which is also a lightweight trainer. The Ultra-Natural Run II and the K-Ona are both 9-ounce shoes, so there is no difference in weight. They vary mostly in the upper, which I found very comfortable and snug.
But, for a shoe that is made to mimic a more natural running gait, I find them a bit high around my ankles. The shoe touches my maleolus (the Kathy Bates bone, if you remember Misery), which is certainly not comfortable on a longer run. This unnerving feature also blocks my ankle flexibility.
The outsole is flexible, but, also again not as flexible as I would expect from a style designed to mimic or accentuate a natural running form. I find the K-Ona even more flexible than the Ultra-Natural Run II.
It's not a bad shoe, but, is it ready to do battle on an even footing with a Nike Free or a Newton? In a battle of Neutral lightweight "free form" models, no, not yet.
Still, it's one of the coolest post-race shoes going. But, I don't think that's what K-Swiss is aiming for.
[Editor’s note: Our capable editor-at-large for footwear Jeroen van Geelen owns Total Running, one of the more important running and triathlon retail establishments in The Netherlands.]
Articles related to this one
Lightweight Trainers Part 3
Our coverage of lightweight training footwear offered for Spring 09 continues with a look at models made by Brooks, Newton and K-Swiss. 1.09.09
Our coverage of lightweight training footwear offered for Spring 09 continues with a look at models made by Brooks, Newton and K-Swiss. 1.09.09
Lightweight Running: Spring 09
This is the first of several articles looking at lightweight technical running footwear, and eventually all important models in all categories of running footwear, offered for sale for the Spring 09 season. 12.05.08
This is the first of several articles looking at lightweight technical running footwear, and eventually all important models in all categories of running footwear, offered for sale for the Spring 09 season. 12.05.08
Comments
Get the name right when doing a shoe review
K-Swiss Ultra-Natural Run II
Reviewed by: Ben Harper , Jan 5 2010 9:56AM
This shoe is called the Ultra-Natural Run II. This shoe was originally designed by Chris Lieto and our performance footwear team. [You're absolutely right, Ben. We'll fix this mistake immediately!]
