Skip to Content


Armstrong Stripped of Tour Titles

Written by: Dan Empfield
Date: Mon Oct 22 2012

The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI), cycling’s world governing body, announced it is not going to contest USADA’s punitive actions against Lance Armstrong. The UCI could have appealed the USADA ruling to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), the court of last resort in cases under the federation umbrella.

The UCI is itself embattled, because of the oft-repeated charge that it was itself complicit in the covering up of Armstrong’s doping, and had accepted bribes to keep the doping a secret.

The owners of the Tour de France, Amaury Sport Organization (ASO), has acceded to USADA’s request that Armstrong be stripped of his 7 Tour de France titles. It has indicated the titles will remain vacant, as there is no pathway to declaring new victors that would easily clear scrutiny. The plethora of doping convictions and allegations that surround so many of the top-10 finishers during the Armstrong era make declaring a new victor a practical difficulty.

Oakley has become the latest sponsor to distance itself from Armstrong, steering the same course as have other sponsors. “Oakley has severed its longstanding relationship with Lance Armstrong, effective immediately,” it said, adding that Livestrong Foundation, “has been a positive force in the lives of many affected by cancer and, at this time, Oakley will continue to support its noble goals.”
SCA Promotions, a Dallas-based insurance company, has sent a demand letter asking Armstrong to return $7.5 million ($5 million plus interest and Armstrong’s legal costs) he earned as a result of winning the unprecedented number of titles, the BBC reported. However, that might be hard, since the sides have tangled in the past, resulting in a voluntary settlement between the parties. Whether there is a legal pathway to unwind the settlement is unknown, even in light of Armstrong’s failure to prevail in every legal or quasi-legal venue so far.

That’s so far this week for the Armstrong camp, and it’s still Monday morning. The IOC may look at Armstrong’s bronze medal he won in Sydney, in 2000, in the TT.

  

  

  

Articles related to this one
Sally Jenkins' Omission
Ms. Jenkins, everything you wrote about Lance is true. But everything you wrote is beside the point. You did not write that Lance abused his place as custodian of that which that gave him his opportunity. 12.17.12
The Entire Lance Armstrong
For some weeks I have been receiving calls and emails urging me to express my view on Lance Armstrong (to these I say, be careful what you ask for). After considerable deliberation, here it is. 10.26.12
You Are Not Welcome Here Anymore
You have been the topic of endless discussions and merely mentioning your name has turned friends against each other, and this editor actually just wished that you would stay away from cycling and triathlon. 1.14.13
Nike out, who next?
(updated: several more sponsors out) Nike severs a longstanding relationship with Lance Armstrong, and the pressure is on Trek, Bontrager, SRAM, Oakley to make a decision on cycling's most loved and hated superstar 10.17.12
Armstrong Case Revealed
USADA handed its Armstrong file to the UCI, along with a press statement naming 11 riders who testified against Armstrong, including several who're finishing up their 2013 seasons, and will now face suspensions and disqualifications. 10.10.12