Accessing Transition as a Non-Athlete? You’re Now Supposed to Be SafeSport Certified

USA Triathlon’s latest revision to a key policy for sanctioned events includes a guide that, if followed, would massively expand who is required to take SafeSport training.
SafeSport, the shorthand for the training provided by the U.S. Center for SafeSport, is training required by all U.S. Olympic and Paralympic governing bodies for key stakeholders. This training covers emotional, physical, and sexual abuse and misconduct, and how to report violations.
This training has been required training for USA Triathlon certified officials, race directors, and coaches for many years. Now, though, according to documents provided to Slowtwitch, race directors are now being asked to require SafeSport training for a much larger swath of race weekend staff, volunteers, and others.
The most recently revised USA Triathlon Events Quality Control policy includes a series of requirements for all USAT sanctioned events. According to USA Triathlon’s website, that covers more than 3,000 unique events; this count includes more than just sanctioned races, but also things like club events. The sanctioned race total is somewhere north of 1,000 unique races.
Buried in the definitions section of the quality control policy is the following line about SafeSport:
Completion of SafeSport training is required for individuals in roles with Direct Contact or Direct Authority over athletes in sanctioned events.
Further up in the same document is a definition of Direct Contact or Direct Authority under the policy. Direct Authority is defined as:
The power or responsibility to make decisions or give orders directly to an individual athlete, typically in a one-on-one context, where those decisions or orders significantly impact the athlete’s actions, outcomes, or overall experience in the event.
Direct Contact, on the other hand, is defined as:
Interaction involving physical presence or proximity that is personal, occurring one-on-one or in small groups, where the interaction with athletes is direct and focused, typically in a more prolonged or continuous manner. Due to the concentration of athletes and activities in control areas, it is assumed that anyone with access to these areas will have Direct Contact with athletes.
The problem comes when you define the areas where these interactions take place. These so-called Control Areas are places where (italicized added below):
Direct Contact with athletes or Direct Authority over athletes is implied or inevitable due to the concentration of athletes or nature of the area. Examples include transition areas, changing areas, bathrooms, locker rooms, cool decks, start areas, and staging areas.
Putting it all together, then: if you are someone working an event that has access to transition, the start or pre-race staging area (and, likely, the finish chute, too), according to this document, you are now supposed to get SafeSport certification.

The examples included in the document as people who must receive SafeSport training include volunteers in transition areas; medical staff with access to control areas; and “all other individuals with access to Control Areas.” In theory, that would also mean credentialed media members with access to these control areas, such as this outlet. Or, alternatively, media members would lose inside-the-ropes access to start areas, finish lines, transition, and more.
According to race directors we spoke with, the primary reaction to this section of the document has been with a collective shrug of the shoulders. One cited how closed a public park, the location of many smaller events, could actually be. Another cited the struggle to get volunteers in the first place, and that adding an additional barrier for volunteers to serve would likely only serve as a deterrent.
In response to Slowtwitch, a USA Triathlon spokesperson wrote, “We recognize the concerns raised by some race directors regarding how certain SafeSport policies apply within the unique context of triathlon. USA Triathlon, along with other National Governing Bodies, is actively collaborating with the Center to establish future policies that are practical, appropriate, and tailored to our sport’s specific structure and needs.”
In addition to the location restriction, USA Triathlon has also issued guidance that all racer and volunteer check-in should be cross-matched against their Banned and Suspended Lists. These lists contain those who have received lifetime bans from USA Triathlon, as well as those with temporary suspensions from either the U.S. Center for SafeSport or from USA Triathlon itself. Bans from the U.S. Center for SafeSport can include temporary suspensions due to allegations of misconduct, all the way to permanent bans as a result of criminal investigations into sexual abuse.
The Banned List contains the following names and the date(s) of their lifetime ban from USA Triathlon:
First Name | Last Name | Suspension Date |
---|---|---|
Colin | Andrews-Gibson | January 2018 |
Bryan | Meyers | March 2018 |
David | Wolfsmith | July 2018 |
Todd | Lippin | July 2019 |
Tom | Brooks | September 2020 |
Brett | Sutton | June 2021 |
Allan | Armstrong | July 2021 |
Adrian | Valdivieso | December 2021 – December 2025 |
Jamie | Campbell | July 2024 |
Dan | Bruring | October 2024 |
Keith | Kotar | June 2025 |
Meanwhile, the following individuals have temporary suspensions from USA Triathlon:
First Name | Last Name | Suspension Start | Suspension End |
---|---|---|---|
Kenneth | Hedicke | May 2025 | n/a |
Christopher | Woodworth | June 2025 | n/a |
The full list of those either suspended or banned by the U.S. Center for Safesport, regardless of sport, can be found here.
One race producer we spoke to put the total number of race directors who have staff or volunteers checking these lists on race day at zero. Theoretically, these individuals could be blocked off from volunteering via a centralized database to cross-match names against during a registration process. But race day is another story, when most smaller events are providing registration, packet-pickup, and finalizing operations all at the same time.
Sounds like something will be extremely ignored, otherwise volunteer numbers which are already in the drink will collapse.
USAT events are now going to be very difficult to put on. I suspect this requirement will be quickly revised
I mean, ultimately, do you need volunteers in transition or start / finish area, or should that be race staff / medical only?
But the idea that medical also needs SafeSport is crazy talk.
Many of the races I’ve been to have body markers inside transition, as well as volunteers to guide racers to the bike out and run out. You could probably move some of those, but lots of PITA for no real gain.
USAT has to know that this isn’t realistic, so either it will be quickly revised; or it exists so that USAT can blame RDs for non-compliance if anything does go wrong.
I’m kinda surprised safesport isn’t a requirement of any national federation membership, these days. Obviously that wouldn’t cover people who just randomly volunteer at a race who aren’t an athlete/coach/official, but would seemingly be an easy case of CYA.