forum shop
Logotype Logotype

News Update: IRONMAN Events Fill, Reaction to New Trans Rules, More NYC Races Gone

Photo: IRONMAN

It’s that time of the year when we’re kind of waiting for things to get rolling on the triathlon front. We’re a little over a week from the first WTCS race and, that same weekend, we’ll see the innovative Race Ranger anti-drafting technology used with age group racing at Challenge Wanaka.

In the meantime, though, here are a few stories that have crossed our desks over the last week or so with some thoughts about them:

Follows to the Transgender Athlete Policy Changes

As Ryan Heisler reported last week, “World Triathlon announced sweeping changes to its rules and policies, impacting both elite and age group athletes across the spectrum.”

The issue that has generated the most interest from last week’s announcement has been the revisions to World Triathlon’s official transgender athlete policies for both age group and Elite (professional) athletes. There’s a new “age-group open” category that replaces the men’s category for World Triathlon events, with the age-group female category “limited to athletes ‘assigned female at birth,'” Ryan reported.

There are two excellent follow-up stories that illustrate the complicated issues around all this that are well-worth reading. Kelly O’Mara, who has been doing an outstanding job covering all this stuff for, in her words, “about a decade,” wrote an excellent piece for Feisty (read it here) which outlines some excellent reasons as to why this “new policy is a bad idea.” I can’t do the story justice in a few sentences, but O’Mara points out that the new policy creates a more restrictive environment for age group athletes than elites, this new “open” category is hardly going to be “welcoming or inclusive,” and the issue around enforcement since World Triathlon will look into the issue “when athletes report other athletes.”

The other story I would direct you towards is by an Alex Hutchinson (who I used to work with at Canadian Running Magazine). In a piece he wrote for Outside, Hutchinson deciphers the science outlined in a paper published in January in the Journal of Applied Physiology titled “Evidence on Sex Differences in Sports Performance,” which you can read here. The paper outlines seven “statements on the topic of sex difference in sport, along with the evidence to support them.”

Hutchinson concludes:

“But even if you take them all at face value, they don’t tell you what the rules for transgender or intersex athletes should be. That involves a difficult balance between fairness and inclusion. Maybe the male-female differences discussed here are the most important consideration; maybe they’re outweighed by other factors. I don’t think there are any easy answers here, but any compromises we reach need to acknowledge that these differences exist and are persistent.”

Hutchinson nailed it – a transgender policy should balance fairness and inclusion. O’Mara argues that this new policy won’t do that, and I tend to agree. With the current political climate, though, finding “balance” on such a fraught issue will be tough.

New York Triathlon Puts 2025 Races On “Permanent Hiatus”

This will be old news for some, but on January 24 New York Triathlon announced that it won’t be putting on any events this year.

New York Triathlon (NYTRI) has been running since 1983 (it began as a tri club in Syracuse) and, according to the company’s website, “is now the longest-running triathlon race organization in the Northeast.” The grassroots events the group organized (over 800 over the years) included duathlon and sprint triathlon events in and around New York City.

I reached out to the current race directors in hopes of getting more information on the 2025 races, but have not heard anything back.

The news, though, highlights the challenges of putting on a race in the region. The New York City Triathlon (bought by Supertri a few years ago), hasn’t taken place for a few years and its uncertain if it will ever return.

There is some good news for New York City racers. On Tuesday night I was part of an information session for the returning “Westchester Triathlon,” (full disclosure – I have done announcing at the Toughman Tri, another race organized by the new race director, Richard Izzo, and I will probably be announcing at the Westchester race this year). During that call I also got to chat with the race director of the Mighty Montauk Triathlon, Merle McDonald Aaron. That race has been running since 1982.

IRONMAN 70.3 Oceanside Sells Out

If you want to race in Oceanside this year you’ll have to grab an IRONMAN Foundation spot or sign up for one of the “enhanced athlete event experiences.” The Oceanside race kicks off IRONMAN’s North American season that includes nine full-distance races and 34 70.3s.

Other races that I’ve seen that are sold out include the IRONMAN 70.3 events in Mont-Tremblant, Rockford-Illinois, Oregon and IRONMAN Ottawa.

I’ve reached out to IRONMAN to see what stats are available around race registration. I am pretty sure numbers have been getting better year over year since the pandemic, but it would be great to have the stats to back that “feeling” up. We are definitely well past the days when there were a lot more IRONMAN events sold out by this time of year, though. I’ll do a follow up story once I have some stats.

Tags:

IRONMANIRONMAN 70.3 OceansideNYC TriathlonTransgenderWorld Triathlon

Notable Replies

  1. There really are easy answers. 1. Be kind to people who feel differently and feel marginalized. 2. Don’t allow 20 year olds to compete in the 30 year old category, even if there are some 30 year olds who can wipe the floor with said 20 year old. Same goes with men and women.

    Beyond that, it’s simply, “compete in the category of your biology” (as you would in the case of age) or “create an additional category” for those on the margins that don’t feel they fit in.

  2. Avatar for monty monty says:

    Yes with the new executive order for heir leader, pretty much a settled science for at least the next 4 years. I actually think it is the right call, just from a group of people that will marginalize and not be kind to that group of folks…It was done out of malice and hate, even though the decision was a correct one…

  3. It was done out of malice and hate

    Have you ever considered that allowing the marginalized ruin the hopes, dreams and hard work of women and girls was done out of malice and hate?

  4. …considering… Considered…

    Ok, yep, done considering and am satisfied from who I’ve met and know and any of the things I’ve read that those transgender athletes did not chose to race triathlon (or any other sport) out of malice and hatred for women and girls.

    What I do consider is that for those transgender athletes who happened to be succesful (and lets not suggest that all transgender athletes do make it to the top) then this is possibly the first time in their lives that they have had the opportunity to feel proud of who they are. Equally, I can fully appreciate that there are some women that have absolutely no hatred or malace from a philosophical perspective being resentful at their loss of opportunity to stand on the podium due to actual biological advantages of specific transgender athletes. So there is a potential perverse outcome from the desire to be inclusive.

    Edit. To be clear I am not advocating for anything, I think this is a really lose lose situation all round. But one thing here to correct is I don’t believe it’s deliberate malice.

  5. Avatar for monty monty says:

    Yes I have considered that, and from all I can see and tell, those trans athletes are motivated by the same things as you and I. Are you motivated by malaice and hate?? Didnt think so…

    And once again, I believe it is the right path forward, just do not believe in the motivations of those making the rules.

  6. I’d actually counter in that this is a win for the women who are born female at birth category, which seemingly at times seemed to be forgotten in the fight for “inclusion” in sport (in a way it seeme if you were a woman and weren’t “pro woman power” for anyone who wants to be a woman you were also then labele with “malice and hate”). Within sport I’ve always thought it’s better to side with fair play, because as I asked in a thread a week ago.

    Who gets to decide what is or isn’t inclusive? Is it always the end user that gets to decide? Which means we’ll all have differing opinions on that right? Inclusion is sorta an impossible standard at this point in our society is it not? If we are constantly evolving into what we want to be or who we decide we are, there’s never going to be inclusion enough to satisfy that quest I wouldn’t think.

  7. I think pointing to any individual as an act of malice with regard to policy debates and implementation gets tricky. There have been some real acts of malices with physical attacks. Sadly, there is a both sides case here with some of the attacks (again both sides) horrifying.

    The difficulty we find in modernity is discourse can be weaponised after a fashion and used for PR purposes by smiling snakes (wolves in sheep’s clothing if you will).

    This isn’t really so modern as we can go back generations to find double speak, and wonderful flowering happy things said by very messed up people who want to do terrible things.

    But I suppose in modern times we struggle to call spades spades and err boys boys as it were.

  8. This is always the sticking point on “fairness v. inclusion”. Fairness is comparatively easier to solve. Inclusion tends to be a moving target. Surely if MtF are allowed to compete with ~5y testosterone suppresion the next argument would be about how they have to suppress testosterone but other females don’t.

    Inclusion has a time and a place and it’s okay that not every single thing is 100% inclusive. Voting, libraries, public spaces, things like that should of course be fully inclusive. (We’re already willing to say violent criminals shouldn’t be in parks and pedophiles shouldn’t be in libraries though).

    Participating in sports is not a fundamental right. Participating in sports under chosen categories is even less of a right.

  9. World Rugby spent millions on studies and every single study showed advantage was retained. There is not a single sport where advantage is not maintained. The amount of hormones needed to be taken to remove the advantage would likely be unsafe. The “science” on the performance side has been settled. In fact you could say it’s been settled for as long as our race has existed.

  10. Avatar for monty monty says:

    I agree whole heartedly with their results…

  11. With respect, I suggest there are a number of sports where the strength and other advantages gained during male puberty do not appear to offer a material beneficial competitive effect. I am totally ignorant here - is there a list?
    Equine competitions various (think there is no separate women’s class anyway)
    Archery
    Shooting
    Synchronised swimming
    Diving
    Otherwise (and generally), see this oz article:

  12. Avatar for monty monty says:

    He said sports, not games… (-;

Continue the discussion at forum.slowtwitch.com

Participants

Avatar for BDoughtie Avatar for Ajax_Bay Avatar for Duncan74 Avatar for Lurker4 Avatar for swimbikefly Avatar for monty Avatar for TheStroBro Avatar for admin Avatar for mathematics

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.