Lightweight Fernweg Review
Written by: Greg Kopecky
Added: Fri Jul 13 2012
What am I talking about? None other than the new Lightweight Fernweg wheel set:
Lightweight was purchased by Carbonsports in 2003, and has grown to the brand you see today. They now have a wide variety of wheel models to suit different sports and needs. What they were clearly lacking on in the past was a true aerodynamic option. Yes, their standard 53mm depth rim is undoubtedly more aerodynamic than your training wheel – but it is a narrow V-shaped rim, which we now know isn’t the fastest shape for higher wind angles or wider tires.
Enter the Fernweg:
You see, normally a “V” rim has the widest point at the braking surface, and then it gets narrower as you travel towards the spokes. This rim is opposite – it is widest at the spokes, and narrowest at the braking surface. Sound a little odd? Well, put a tire on top of that rim, and you have a complete system that looks very symmetrical. No matter what direction the wind comes from or what part of the wheel it hits first, you can expect the rim/tire system to deal with it predictably. Not only are they optimizing the leading edge of the wheel (the tire side), but also the trailing edge (spoke side). Think of it this way: that air has to first hit the tire, attach itself to the wheel, come off the trailing rim edge and in to the spokes – and then start all over again on the rear half of the wheel. As Hed, Trek, Zipp, and others have shown us, a blunt shaped object often does better than a sharp edge, at least when it comes to keeping airflow attached and laminar. In order to roughly match the rim’s widest point of 22.4mm, I chose to use a 22mm width tubular tire – the Schwalbe Ultremo HT 700x22.
And they sure do look good together.
Braking was outstanding for a carbon rim – perhaps the best I’ve ever experienced. Lightweight includes their own special compound of pad, and I also tested the wheels with the Zipp platinum pad. Either way, you get great braking. Fortunately for me – but unfortunately for this test – I did not get a chance to test the braking in rain, so I cannot speak for the wet performance.
Acceleration was what you’d expect – fast. These wheels are light. Astoundingly light, given their depth of 81mm. Total weight is 1,355 grams per pair - 640 front and 715 rear. The first time you pick them up, your brain does a momentary double-take as it calculates the math of what you’re holding.
My personal race/travel bike has S&S Couplers, so it isn’t the lightest bike around. These wheels sure helped with that, and spruced up the looks to boot.
There was one problem, however. When I put a larger cassette on for a hilly race I planned to do, the inner cage of my SRAM Red derailleur brushed the spokes of the wheel while in the gear combination of big chainring and big cog. For a while, I couldn’t figure it out. What was going on? With the 11-23 cassette I had originally, the derailleur didn’t rub. With the 11-27 I put on, however, it rubbed. Derailleur hanger was straight. Chain sized properly. Nothing awry with the cassette. What was going on? While difficult to capture in photo simply due to the location of the problem, this is what I’m talking about:
Just out of curiosity, I put a different wheel in the bike – a Zipp 808 Firecrest. On this wheel, the spokes cleared by about .5mm. This had me curious, then, about the derailleur. Shouldn’t there be more clearance than half a millimeter? Perhaps I had a derailleur cage that got over-painted in the clear-coating process? I compared to my other tri bike, which has both a SRAM rear derailleur and Zipp wheel, and it had about 2mm of clearance in the big/big combination. I inquired with SRAM, whose representative told me that they thought it was only a problem with the Lightweight wheel.
The take-home for this story is to check clearance of this on any combination of frame, wheel, and derailleur. With the advent of 9, 10, and 11-speed cassettes, there is not much extra room hanging out on the drive-side of our bikes. Wheel manufacturers want to put the drive-side spokes as far to the right as possible to retain wheel stiffness. What this means, however, is our spokes and derailleurs are getting very cozy with each other. Be sure your derailleur hanger is straight, as this is one quick way to ensure maximum clearance and safety. Also be sure your chain is sized properly. If it is too short, that makes the derailleur’s cage have to swing further forward when in gear combinations such as big/big. You could argue that we really ought not to cross-chain our bikes that severely, and I agree. However, the racer and athlete in me knows that in race situations, we don’t always have the time or mental capacity to think through our gear choice – so I want every possible gear combination to work safely.
What happens if you do damage your Lightweight wheel? Say, you slam a huge pothole or accidentally drive your car in to the garage while your bike is still on top (I’m sure none of you have ever done THAT). Lightweight does have a crash replacement program that offers a 30% discount for replacements. They also told me that repairs are often possible in the event of a broken spoke or similar damage.
And what about price? To be frank, the information provided to me about the wheels didn’t even mention it. I think we can all agree that the general rule applies here: you get what you pay for. Or – if you have to ask…
Lightweight’s “standard” set of road wheels starts at around $4,500, depending on the exchange rate at the time. I wouldn’t count on getting a pair of Fernwegs in the US for anything less than five grand. Now, are these wheels necessarily more aerodynamic than other high end wheels? I doubt it, but they are certainly among them. That is a big statement for Lightweight, and a big step forward for them. In the past, Lightweight always had the cool factor and (obviously) light weight going for them. Now that they’ve added legitimate aero technology to the mix, they are a serious contender for all-around performance. And – for the clincher-lovers out there, Lightweight tells me that they “are working on” a carbon clincher version of this wheel set, for launch in the next year or two…
Lightweight sure are proud of the new wheels. According to them, it was a three year R&D process that included many tests in the wind tunnel, on the track, and on the road. They tell me: “With FERNWEG, we have remained true to our LIGHTWEIGHT motto: build the best wheels in the world that combine the three key performance factors of low aerodynamic drag, low weight and maximum stiffness.” After having the pleasure of putting these wheels through their paces, I think they’ve delivered a knock-out.
We take an in-depth look at the wheel offerings from Shimano for 2012, along with a preview of soon-to-be-released 2013 product. Has the Japanese giant finally gone aero? 8.06.12
Consider this your official PSA on valve extenders. We describe the ins and outs, and show how this oft frustrating piece of equipment really can be your friend. 8.20.12
We are currently in Friedrichshafen, Germany for the Eurobike trade show and had the opportunity to visit the Lightweight / Carbon Sports brand today. 8.27.12
We review the 2013 Zipp Super-9 Carbon Clincher disc wheel. Claimed to be the “fastest wheel ever”, we take a close look at this new disc to find out for ourselves just how fast it is. 10.20.12
Today we take a closer look at the ultra light Mad Fiber wheels, which we had in our hands for a long-term test and all the test bikes that had them mounted were seeing instant signs of a successful diet. 10.24.12
German brand Carbon Sports introduced the Lightweight Urgestalt a few weeks before the 2013 Eurobike show, but it is not a new wheel - it is a bike. 8.12.13
We take a detailed look at the new Mavic Cosmic CXR80, which they claim to be the lowest drag tire and rim combination currently available. We now have a pair to test, and aim to find out how fast they really are. 7.06.12
German-based Schwalbe introduces a host of updated and new product for 2012. This includes the latest entry in to the tubeless market, with some very surprising rolling resistance numbers. 6.15.12