forum shop
Logotype Logotype

Last Learnings from T100 London

Photos: Kevin Mackinnon

The Professional Triathlete’s Organisation (PTO) has had what one could charitably refer to as growing pains throughout 2025. On the positive front it has delivered on its mission of world-class professional racing across nearly every T100 event thus far this year. It’s also landed another round of sizable investment, which should comfortably allow it to operate for at least another couple of seasons. On the negative, we’ve seen multiple race date moves, as well as not paying out on its 2024 bonus structure until very recently.

At the very least, the PTO never gives you a dull moment.

My family and I recently went on a long European vacation — we flew into London Heathrow and spent a couple of days in town prior to boarding a Disney Cruise Line boat out to Belgium and Norway for over a week. It was only in the final week before we flew out that I realized hey, we’ll be in town for T100 London. So in between the chaos of fitting in as much London as we could into a couple of days on vacation and before entering the Mouse’s boat, I figured at the very least I could check out what was happening with the T100 event.

Let me tell you: I came away pretty impressed. Here’s why.

Big Age-Group Events Give You Built In Spectator Audiences

The sheer size of the following day’s age-group race in London gives the professional event the thing that translates onto streaming screens globally: the almighty spectator audience. (For what it’s worth, this is also a reason why people wind up choosing IRONMAN branded events when they race longer — the crowd vibes help).

Ever since the original PTO-branded Open events in 2022, the PTO has been chasing having large numbers of spectators at its events. Those original races, which tied into World Triathlon and USA Triathlon events, brought out massive (for triathlon) crowds that lined streets and run courses. It’s those things that help make the race bigger, feel bigger. Atmosphere matters. Part of why people watch the Tour de France every year are the spectators. You can’t have one without the other.

The genius of the T100 scheduling in London is that the professional races roughly coincide with athlete check-in for the age-group race the following day. It naturally creates a spectator destination. And it’s a more invested audience, as opposed to when professionals are racing alongside age-groupers; it’s usually the triathlete racing that’s going to know the names of the pros they are rubbing shoulders with, rather than their families. Or, if they are going to inspire their families to start following the sport, you have someone to help explain the who / what / how of what’s taking place.

It’s smart. And it simply has to be the model forward for the other T100 events — assuming that, of course, the end game remains to help build a sustainable media-rights based business. That remains the multimillion dollar question; what is the actual end-game, here? If it’s on media rights, which it would appear that the PTO is as primed as any to capitalize on, having spectators on course is a critical component. Which means that either a.) the age-group race business has to become self-sustaining, or b.) they need to continue to look at partnering with existing large races to run a similar model as to what happens in London.

There’s another ingredient missing in London.

The London Pro Course Does Not Show Off the Location

Well, unless you really like the area around City Airport.

Located well to the eastern side of the city, the home base for the T100 event is a necessary one; it’s by far the best spot in the city for a safe swim. But, unlike the age group race the following day, which takes athletes on a three lap course all the way back to Westminster and past iconic city structures like the Tower of London, the pros race a much shorter, multi-lap circuit that is far more industrious.

It simply misses the mark on what could, and should be, the crown jewel of the T100 event circuit. The courses need to bring just as much personality as the athletes do. Kona looks iconic. Roth looks iconic. Heck, even the Ibiza T100 event had a fantastic look to it. We need to see these athletes in London.

The Age Group Model – What Will it Take?

The PTO has done a somewhat good job building up age group events in a couple of locations. Namely, here in London, as well as in Singapore and in Dubai. There’s still plenty of work to be done; the now cancelled Las Vegas event, for instance.

They’ve hired some of the right people to make that happen. Eric Opdyke is now part of the PTO/T100 team. That name should be familiar to athletes who’ve been around for a little while; Eric was the long-time race director turned face of the franchise at Rev3. One could easily make the argument that Rev3 was the last sizable race series challenger for age-group dollars to IRONMAN. And Eric’s got experience in building memorable experiences and events for both professionals and age-groupers. When given the resources, he puts together a hell of an event. (Disclosure: yes, we worked together back in the day.)

The bigger question is on those resources. If there’s conflict between professional needs and age grouper ones, which wins out? We know the answer at IRONMAN. We don’t know the answer yet for T100. And that, ultimately, might be the biggest hurdle they have to overcome.

Tags:

Opiniont100 london

Notable Replies

  1. Dammit. Showed Lucy breaking the tape with no spoiler warning.
    #pink

    But seriously, interesting (good) article, but I think getting the RD/Race organisers comments on the why/how/viability of the suggestions would be good.

    EG, to have the Pros race during check-in, ie the day before that means the race has to be daytime and Saturday. Which in London (many major cities) is when you can’t have road closures past all the landmarks. Equally, if you did have the pros racing past the landmarks (I’d saw London Olympic course had the landmarks) that doesn’t have the capacity / infrastructure needed for the 5,000+ age group race. Also would mean that those athletes registering would say to their family " Oh, look that blur that went past in 3seconds at 45kph was person X. Just lets stand here for 2.5 hours and then see them for 3s as they come back at the end of their ride… The laps approach works for the Pros, but of course we all hate for AG racing / draft fests.

    I guess my point is that to me it seems London T100 has done pretty much all that they could to do the things we ask for other than the mutually exclusive things.

  2. Frankly…

    I would have the age group course roll further north and east, and move the pro race to the spectacle of downtown. Assuming, of course, that the model is predicated on creating a media-friendly event that is made for TV, and exclusive to the pros racing.

    Because the other option is the IM model. And Opdyke has plenty of experience running a pro race, a 70.3, and an Olympic all at the same time…

    But, then again, then you’re just putting on a slightly different version of the IM product.

  3. If that could be done, it’s great. Otherwise, I think they hopefully figure out sooner, rather than later, that by combining age groupers and pros on the -gasp- same course, they can actually justify a more interesting bike course.

    No one watches Ironman, sees a huge group of people running and cycling on the broadcast and says, “this is unprofessional”. It 100% adds to the appeal, and contra your assertion that the spectators are better when they are athletes checking in, I suggest that the crowds who turn out to support their families will look just as exciting on the broadcast cheering for LCB even if they have no idea who she actually is. And the reason WHY people are fans of LCB and Lionel and Sam Long, etc. is specifically because they turned out and watched their family and then saw Lucy running by. My kids are enamored with Gustav Iden because they watched him run passed them multiple times in St. George completely dominating. Not because they know anything about him.

    To sum up:

    1. You’ll be able to have a better bike and run course.
    2. You’ll have more people on the course to make things look more interesting.
    3. You’ll have more spectators scattered throughout the course.

    The only negative is that you have to deal with extra “traffic” in a multiloop course. But that’s not exactly been a deal breaker in Ironman, and I submit the reason why the T100 is great has nothing to do with the fact that that the bike course is mostly empty.

  4. As an in-person spectator, I certainly prefer the pros do short loops multiple times. I want to see them as often as possible. So, if there is a choice between showing off London landmarks vs multiple loops conveniently close to packet pickup, I’d prefer the latter.

    Given all the criticism that the T100 failed to show off London, I think it’s worth remembering that it did have some pretty iconic shots in earlier races. The Singapore race, although mostly on a highway for the bike, made me actually want to go to Singapore with the shots of cool towers and lush gardens. SF had the Golden Gate in the background. In Vancouver we saw the skyline plus a couple of Orcas.

  5. Note and respect your views. But don’t agree with them.

    1. From Excel (the venue and where the dock is, one of the very very few possible London Swim locations) in London you are 12km out east from the centre of London and the landmarks you want to see. And north and west of here you have Dagenham, Wanstead and Forest Gate. Not being rude to their charm and appeal, but no one is jumping on an 8 hour flight inspired by those shots.
      2&3) As above, multi lap out and back for pros gets people watching. Single lap loops for AG offers best participant experience. If you don’t have a good participant experience then the 90% of crowd that are there primarily to be the sherpa for the athletes track pump won’t be there anyway.

    Other cities may be really different regarding route options that could be both landmark, looped and have capacity for 6-8000. Just London from either Serpentine or Excel Docks doesn’t.

Continue the discussion at forum.slowtwitch.com

Participants

Avatar for Lurker4 Avatar for rrheisler Avatar for Duncan74 Avatar for Changpao

Be honest: do you know how to change a flat on your bike?

If given the choice, you prefer to ride a wheel that is:

Do you believe that hookless wheels are unsafe, or simply not for you?