blueseventy Helix (2012)
Written by: Dan Empfield
Date: Mon Apr 02 2012
The new Helix differs in several ways from its antecedent, but, what does not change is the superior engineering and attention to detail in the neck, the zipper, and other troublesome areas that prove the weak link in many wetsuit designs.
The hand entry is also unchanged from last year, and this is a signature departure in the Helix from many, most or all other wetsuits. Rather than building the forearm up with one sort of pulling panel or another, the Helix goes minimal, and even features the lack of any rubber—placing Lycra (or its equal) in its place—in some parts of the forearm. The wrist is impervious to water, and will appeal to those who want a no-wetsuit feel in a fullsuit.
The Helix features a reverse zipper, meaning the zipper zips from the top down (the zipper slides down to as you prepare to swim, and you then zip it up to get out of the suit). The advantage to this is that the zipper cannot pull down in the water (i.e., cannot be pulled down inadvertently or otherwise by a fellow competitor). The disadvantage is that it's harder to put the wetsuit on by yourself. I frankly like the standard zippers better. But I stipulate to the reasoning.
On the flip side, the Helix in that same size seems to nicely fit Lance Armstrong, who swam in it over the weekend in the Galveston 70.3 and emerged in the front pack. He and I are the same weight, but he's 3 inches shorter than I am. He's also leggy. So, his torso is considerably shorter than mine.
But, since he's shorter, where's the extra weight? His chest is bigger than mine. So, was the Helix too tight in the chest for him?
This brings us to the big difference between this and last year's Helix. When I first got the wetsuit, it looked a lot to me like a technique employed by my former right hand gal at Quintana Roo, Karen Sing. During the diaspora of my old staff, she ended up at Zoot (she's now at Profile Design), and the Zoot suit she designed was made entirely of thin rubber (2mm or thereabouts), with thicker panels sewed inside in strategic areas that conspired to make the suit 5mm thick sorta kinda throughout, but strategically-placed 2mm-thick stretch panels interspersed.
The new Helix appears to be made like this, but in reality the suit is more conventional in its construction, with panels of various thicknesses butted and mated. What you'll note in the new Helix is a very thin center channel moving from just below the neck to around the sternum. The rubber in this channel is only 2.5mm thick. It's made of hyper-stretchy Yamamoto #40 rubber with very stretchy nylon jersey attached. This splits the 5mm panels of high-float Aerodome rubber, and this is what allows a barrel-chested swimmer like Armstrong to wear a suit that might otherwise seem chest-tight to him.
The blueseventy Helix is a $650 fullsuit. It's also made in a sleeveless version which, as you might guess if you're a Slowtwitch reader, is a nonsensical version. Sleeveless wetsuits are made for the bargain hunters, or those who somehow find themselves in a wetsuit-legal race that has no business being wetsuit legal. If you bought the 6-cylinder motor when you bought your new Dodge Challenger, then, maybe consider the sleeveless Helix. Otherwise, go straight to the fullsuit—the Helix is a muscle car, it's a crime to defile it by lopping off the sleeves.
This ought to remind us all that there is nothing triathletes use—not bikes, or bibs or skinsuits or helmets—that are as fit-fickle as wetsuits. A constant refrain is "buy the bike that fits." How much more so with wetsuits? If expertly made suits like this new Helix fall into this category, how much more important is it to make sure the suit fits, taking into consideration that there are wetsuits out there that will fit no one well, because they are not as expertly made as this Helix?
This TYR Hurricane 5 has pluses and minuses, and usually the pluses cause the minuses. I swam in this suit, juxtaposing it with a De Soto T1 Concept 5. Here are the results. 4.11.12
If I was to pull a suit out for a leisurely open water workout with the posse, it’s very likely this is a suit I’d consider, because it’s so comfortable and easy to get on. 4.12.12
I believe this suit every bit as fast as the TYR Hurricane. However, it's better for the right swimmer, and I'm not him. I'm slightly long in the torso, and this company's ideal morphology is average to leggy. 4.17.12
We review the TX2000 and TX3000 triathlon apparel from blueseventy. While better known for their wetsuits, they have a strong offering in apparel, and some surprisingly nice goggles. 8.08.13
No triathlon wetsuit company has stormed onto the scene in recent memory with a bigger bang than Roka. It's ROKA's second year, we've had a year to noodle them, is the fanfare justified? 7.01.14
A follow up to Dan Empfield's primer on the rubber used in triathlon wetsuits. A useful guide as we embark on tests of several of the newest wetsuits to hit the market. 6.29.08
The truth is, almost every wetsuit feature has a corresponding detriment, and certain features have only the detriment, and no corresponding asset. You must decide what features matter to you. 1.01.07