Magnolia Swim Camp

1 of 5 photos
<
>
The Woodlands, Texas is a terrific community for triathletes. The area also happens to be a great place to train for Kona. The heat and humidity are similar if not worse than Kona, there can be a lot of wind, and there are plenty of great places to run and ride. The swimming facilities are some of the best in the country. The community is very supportive of triathletes, especially those from out of town. For this camp, we had three pros from out of town and all of them had homestays for the month. Without the support of individuals and businesses (Sterling Ridge Orthopedics, Klean Athlete, Gold’s Gym, and Bicycle World) in the Woodlands/Magnolia communities, we would not be able to get this very focused and intense work done. I can’t thank everyone enough.
2 of 5 photos
<
>
My focus when I built this team was to create the right culture and community for the athletes. It starts with the athlete, and ensuring that he has a clear goal and a clear idea about how to achieve that goal. To reinforce this model, I recruit ex-college swimmers to train with the pros. This year, I’ve been fortunate to get Mary Foster (former D1 college distance swimmer, marathon swimmer, and Magnolia Masters coach), Emily Finanger (former D1 college swimmer and former pro triathlete), Stephanie Terrell (former D1 college sprint swimmer) and Tim Monk (former D1 college swimmer and AG Kona qualifier). I have found it helpful to put experienced swimmers in the pool with triathletes.

We had our first big workout on Saturday, September 5 although the camp didn’t officially kick off until Tuesday the 8th. The pros that were in attendance on Saturday were Cody Beals, Balazs Csoke, Matt Hanson, and Lisa Roberts. Nils Frommhold was also in town and he joined in. Here’s the workout from Saturday:

Start of the Main Set (Bottom to Top: Beals, Hanson, Csoke, Frommhold, Finanger, Foster, Finanger)
3 of 5 photos
<
>
Warm up:
500 swim with fins
300 kick with fins
200 pull no paddles
4x100 descend 1-4 @ 1:20 (Cody, Balazs, Matt, Nils)/1:30 (Mary, Emily)
Total so far: 1400yd

Kick Set:
12x75 kick @ 1:30/1:40
Total so far: 2300yd

100 easy swim

Main set:
30x50 swim @ hold pace

Hold Pace:
Cody Beals – hold 31 @ 50
Balazs Csoke – hold 29 @ 50
Matt Hanson – hold 30 @ 50
Mary Foster – hold 33 @ 55
Emily Finanger – hold 33 @ 55
Lars Finanger – hold 33 @ 55

Results:
Cody – 31/32
Balazs – 28/29
Matt – 29/30
Mary – 32
Emily – 32
Lars – 31
So far: 3800yd

Warm down:
The goal of the "hold pace" sets is to swim at race pace with around 20 seconds of recovery for a prescribed distance. The original idea for these sets came from Brent Rushall and USRPT (Ultra Short Race Pace Training). We are training the stroke (the "kinetic chain") to swim at a certain pace. The biggest issue with regard to efficiency in swimming is the cost of drag.

For this set, the majority of the athletes paced around 1:00/100 or better for 1500 yards. In my experience, most triathlon coaches train the swim like the bike and run. This is one of the single biggest coaching misunderstandings in triathlon. If the majority of swim training is focused on "metabolics," then you are overlooking where the biggest gains in efficiency come from in swimming – the technique or the neuromuscular efficiency of the stroke movement. The primary objective of the workouts I prescribe is how to push more efficiency into the stroke. Swimming 10x400, 4x1000, or 3x1500 are the more popular swim workouts that that tri coaches prescribe, but all those workouts really do is train your stroke mechanics to move at a slower and less efficient pace. You are ingraining slow, sloppy technique. Overcoming drag through a more efficient movement/body position in the water is more important than training zones. I refer to it as training "technique under load," or swimming high intensity, short repeats while focusing on technique. In my experience, this is the best way to make triathletes more efficient in the water. Let me be clear, this is not an either/or proposition; I do consider metabolics, but is not the primary driver. The main focus is always, "How do we make the stroke more efficient?"

For this camp, and for the pros that are training for Kona, it's important to get as many sessions in the water as possible. In my experience, consistency trumps volume. You get a lot more out of your time in the water from five days a week for thirty minutes a day than you do from one and a half hours a day for three days a week. Again, it all comes back to promoting efficiency and "feel" for the water.

On Sunday, September 6 we did what I consider a "bridge" workout, where I am working with the athletes after some hard bike and run training, understanding that I won't be able to get a very hard swim out of them. I'm trying to "bridge" the "feel" for the water to the next day when they are less fatigued and we can have more productive results.

This is a modified workout that my club swimming coach, Dave Johnson, used to use as the standard daily warm-up and/or meet warm up. He called it the Alamo 2.0. I've modified it a little but kept the same basic outline. From a coaching perspective, there is a benefit to giving a standard warm-up everyday. It trains the body to warm up and then lets the coach and athlete see any variations in performance on a day-to-day basis.

Warm up:
400 swim w/fins
400 kick w/fins
400 pull no paddles
8x50 choice (swim/kick, drill, kick, swim, descend, etc.) @ 15 seconds rest interval
4x100 descend 1-4 @ 1:20/1:30/1:40 (different times based on ability levels in the pool)
2000 yards

At the end of this practice we played around with a new gadget that Magnolia Masters recently purchased. It's basically a "power meter" for the water. Over the last 9 months, I've been building a library of data on beginning triathletes through pros, ex-college swimmers and Olympic Trial Qualifiers. The results have been interesting and have led me to ask some questions about swimming and swim efficiency. Below are the results of three different athletes that I recently put on the "power rack." The first is a late thirties age group male triathlete that qualified for Kona 2 years ago, who swims between 1:05-1:10 for a full. The second set of data is from one of the fastest pro Ironman male swimmers. The third set of data is from a high school swimmer who recently qualified for US Olympic Trials in the 800m free. One insight that was confirmed by the "power rack" data was the importance of the kick. In the data posted below, the blue line represents the velocity of the swimmer measured every 60th of a second. The biggest negative impact on swimming efficiency comes from slowing down. If you slow down, the impact of drag on the efficiency of the stroke as you try to speed up again is substantial. The data shows that a good, efficient kick makes the trough of the blue line shallower and makes the overall swim more efficient. The kick limits the amount of deceleration of your overall velocity.

Age Group Triathlete =>
4 of 5 photos
<
>
Pro Ironman Triathlete =>
5 of 5 photos
<
>
US Olympic Trials Qualifier (800m freestyler) =>
PREV
NEXT
1 of 5 photos
>
<